Is controversial breastfeeding doll
‘over-sexualizing’ our children?

7-year-old Maggie gently picks up her brand new baby doll and swaddles her tightly in a warm, fuzzy polka-dot blanket.  She tenderly kisses her baby’s tiny forehead and serenades her with a sweet lullaby.  Continuing to affectionately tend to the comfort of her make-believe newborn, Maggie lovingly removes the infant doll’s soiled diaper and replaces it with a fresh clean one and proceeds to her miniature rocking chair, where she patiently and tenderly attempts to comfort her baby doll.  Realizing that her brand-new baby must be hungry, Maggie carefully lifts her baby to her specially designed halter top, which has nipples covered by petal appliqués and sewn-in sensors to simulate suckling sounds, and begins to “breastfeed” her infant doll.

Maggie’s new doll, The Breast Milk Baby, is creating quite the controversy and has received intense criticism since its introduction into the U.S. market.  Many retailers are refusing to place the Spanish toy company’s product on their shelves even more than a year after its initial release.   Critics claim that the doll “over-sexualizes” young girls and “forces them to grow up too quickly.”   Bill O’Reilly declared on his show, The O’Reilly Factor, “I just want the kids to be kids. And this kind of stuff. We don’t need this.”

Berjaun Toys’ US representative, Dennis Lewis, says, “We’ve had a lot of support from lots of breastfeeding organizations, lots of mothers, lots of educators. There also has been a lot of blowback from people who maybe haven’t thought to think about really why the doll is there and what its purpose is. Usually they are people that either have problems with breastfeeding in general, or they see it as something sexual.”

Is The Breast Milk Baby an inappropriately precocious toy for our young daughters to be playing with?  Or is the backlash swirling around this particular baby doll grossly misunderstood and just another symptom of how far off track we have ventured in relation to who we really are?   We walk past a mother cat nursing her kittens and smile at its sweetness; yet we exile new mothers to their cars, we usher them into private rooms, out of the public eye, covered up, to breastfeed their newborn infants in an effort to avoid offending others around her.

Is it heartwarming to stand witness to a young female, 7 years old, emulating one of the most beloved relationships of all, a mother and her baby, a nurturing Maternal Being providing life-sustaining nourishment to a tiny new life, and appreciating her body’s remarkable ability to be the source of that?   Or is it premature and inappropriate to draw attention to our daughters’ bodies so boldly and unreservedly, encouraging them to express this aspect of their physicality so freely and perhaps in a manner that is too provocative or too sensual?

If it is the avoidance of “over-sexualization” of our children that we, as a society, are leveraging for, then why are the scantily clad Bratz dolls flying off the shelves and landing in the homes of so many young girls?   If given the choice to purchase a Fashionista Barbie or The Breast Milk Baby for your daughter, which would you choose?   And why?

The answers to those questions invite a conversation to begin around the issues we are not talking about (sex, intimacy, and love), affording ourselves an opportunity to take a closer look at what it is we are really afraid of and how those fears may be distorting our thoughts and influencing our choices.

Why do we fear our children learning about, talking about, and embracing their bodies, and understanding the purpose for which they were created?  Why are we attaching the same thick layers of shame and stigma to something so natural and meaningful as breastfeeding that we’ve sadly used to suffocate our own sexuality?

Dysfunction thrives in an environment of restrictions and conditions, where the essence of who we are is stifled, unexpressed, forgotten.  Love unexpressed mutates into a “conditioned” version of love.  Sexuality ignored mutates into shame and confusion, rendering ourselves unable to appreciate and celebrate each aspect of our divinity fully, blurring the lines between who we think we should be and who we actually are…and what we imagine is happening and what is really going on.

What will YOU do if this particular toy finds its way to your child’s Christmas or birthday “wish list”?

(Lisa McCormack is the Managing Editor & Administrator of The Global Conversation.  She is also a member of the Spiritual Helper team at www.ChangingChange.net, a website offering emotional and spiritual support. To connect with Lisa, please e-mail her at Lisa@TheGlobalConversation.com.)

 

Comments

10 responses to “Is controversial breastfeeding doll
‘over-sexualizing’ our children?”

  1. Laura Pringle Avatar
    Laura Pringle

    No comments? REALLY? Quite surprising. *(Not many parents on here???)
    This is a compelling topic. I have to say, I agree with Lisa, and NOT because I want her to review my book! (lol)

    A doll with accessories to foster the concept/process of nurturing a baby (in the most healthy and natural way)- is a wonderful thing ! We don’t associate sexuality with children of doll-playing age, so why should the two be correlated?

    By giving children baby dolls with bottles– and NOT offering them a model that breastfeeds, what are we saying???… Exactly…

  2. Therese Avatar
    Therese

    Well, so many things.

    Very simply, for the people who would find it offensive to have their daughters have the doll…don’t buy it.

    My mother, at 12 years old, discovered blood streaming down her legs and thought she was dying because no one told her there was such a thing as a period. She vowed that if she had a daughter, it would not be that way, so, when I was 9 years, and showing signs of early development, she gave me my very own “kit” and explained what menstruation was all about. Unfortunately, somehow breast feeding, because of the evolution of working mothers, fell out of favor, and my generation was not raised with the example of breastfeeding.

    Scientific studies began to show the health benefits, to the mother and child, and my generation began to attempt to make breastfeeding mainstream once again. I suppose I could go to the obvious reason that it has been so unsuccessful. I mean, it is pretty obvious that there is a lot of money to be lost in several areas if it gets popular once again, but the truth is that it wasn’t money that created this problem. It was how quickly women decided that convenient was better. It was how quickly we bought into the breast being seen in the most natural way possible, indeed being used for one of only two purposes of the breast, was sinful and shameful, and uncomfortable for others to see.

    Breastfeeding epitomizes two of our major issues in this country today…body shame and sex. The breast, oh, my gosh! is actually designed to give a woman sexual pleasure, as well as feed a child.

    It would be a shame, wouldn’t it, if women felt that their bodies held no shame, especially for the two most natural functions of any human body…sustenance and reproduction. Somehow that would empower women to do what? take their full place in this world? raise our children to enjoy one another, be happy with themselves and their bodies, and balance this world? What a shame that would be, right?

    My question has long been, why do women continue to buy into it? Why do they believe that God had to find a virgin to impregnate in a supernatural way? Do these same people believe that Jesus suckled off a supernatural breast rather than that of his own mother? Why do men carry the burdens of hanging on to this truly unnatural power that is killing them, literally? How is any of this working for anyone?

    The United States, in my experience, has more hangups and shame about our bodies and sex than most other countries. I think that this doll is a wonderful idea. When my daughter was two years old, she ran into the living room at a family gathering, crying, and saying that her cousin had hit her on her breast. I quietly explained to her that she had a chest, not a breast, because she was too young. Her grandmother looked at me, aghast! How could I use those words with my young daughter? This was a woman whose son did not even know the proper name for his penis until someone, when he was in his teens, told him. This is also the same woman who did not see anything wrong with using racial slurs around my two year old.

    I don’t want any child to have a grandmother or mother who does not feel her body and its processes are anything other than natural, and teaches that to the child. If I could, I would buy every child this doll, male or female, because it is about nurturing as much as sustenance. It is about love for self and child.

    Therese

  3. Steve Pion Avatar
    Steve Pion

    As with so many other topics that could be mentioned here, this is simply a matter of judgement. This doll may be judged by the act of purchasing it or not. It’s really that simple.

    Just like anything else, if you don’t like or approve of something then ignore it but refusing to allow others that choice is non-productive and egotistical.

  4. Digger Avatar
    Digger

    Hi Lisa,
    I just want to say that I agree with your article entirely- why indeed would we be so happy to buy our daughters a scantily-clad doll which is so overtly sexual, but not one which depicts one of the most wonderful and special relationships possible on this Earth, that of a mother and baby.

    Why indeed do we banish breastfeeding mums to the toilets, as if what they are doing is shameful?

    We need to sort out our priorities in this world, me thinks.

    Best wishes from Digger, Norfolk, England.

  5. mewabe Avatar
    mewabe

    Yes, definitively, giving young girls a breast feeding doll will cause the end of civilization as we know it (hopefully)…on the other end, providing young boys with extremely violent and graphic video games will not (end civilization as we know it, unfortunately).

    I am all for ending this nonsense called “civilization as we know it”.

    Why is violence acceptable, why is war acceptable, and sex and the human body considered unholy? Who created this non-sense? (we all know who…a bunch of old Middle Eastern patriarchs and probable women haters who created Christianity, a religion that has very little to do with what the man called Yeshua stood for).

    Look at all so-called primitive people…they are comfortable with their bodies, and no indigenous tribe anywhere has ever sexualized the female breast as much as Indo-European cultures…why is that?

  6. SL Avatar
    SL

    Hello Lisa,

    I am not sure I am so comfortable with the breast feeding doll, as with all toys that imitate grown up life too exactly. I feel children benefit a lot from creating their own worlds…Worlds and stories that reflect the psychological phase they are in.
    That said the idea that little girls learn from an early age how satisfying and fulflling it is to nourish your baby is great. We do live in a very strange world where the woman’s body is mainly seen and used as a commercial argument, so the more little girls learn how to respect and get the more joy out of their bodies the better our world will be for sure 🙂
    Thanks for a very interesting article!

  7. Erin/IAm Avatar
    Erin/IAm

    I find the concept intriguing, since many women have been moved away from natural feeding of their babes in pursuit of ‘convenient replacement’ options & their profits, while being thrown into Corporate World from young ages with new Moms hardly allowed a few weeks, if lucky, to spend with their newborns before they have to pass on that nurturing time to someone else.

    It would be nice to have this aspect of Mothering Humanity brought into new light with the enthusiasm, caring, & nature connect, that it once held so deeply & absolutely.

    To render a toy as ‘over-sexualizing’ because it is anatomically correct, or imitates a natural process such as breast feeding or peeing, is creepy. I had hoped that our gents were predominantly gaining some control of their ‘Sex is Everything’ train of thinking, and that prudes were as dinosaurs of our kind.

    However, if a little boy was given a doll that spontaneously got a ‘hard-on’, or could pee ‘into’ a toilet…Would we be so obliging to nurture these aspects as well? And how would a Guardian react if little Joey wanted to play with Suzie’s new doll & was ‘overly comfortable’ with doing so? Would we then be de-naturing our man-kind? Would we be ‘sensitizing’ them? (What a shame That would be, huh?):)

    Great food for thought here, Lisa!:)

  8. Buzz Avatar
    Buzz

    The doll is controversial because breastfeeding is controversial. Violent tv and games are accepted because war, terrorism, and conflict at home are accepted.

    Why do we accept it? We believe we have no choice. We see anti-war rallies having no effect, and we know the ones who least look forward to war are soldiers. If they can’t prevent a war, Joe Citizen certainly can’t.

    So why is breastfeeding controvertial? There are so many people saying we should. How dare they tell us what to do. But there are other people saying the first group shouldn’t be listened to. What right do they have to say who I can and can’t listen to. Then there’s a third group who offer an artificial alternative at reasonable prices, and say “ours is not the best way, just one way” and everyone who hates being told what to think, say and do flocks to stores. We call this free will.

    We are a strange species.

  9. mewabe Avatar
    mewabe

    Breast feeding is not controversial in so called primitive societies, among human beings who are not so alienated from nature and from their own nature.

    The civilized mind is essentially neurotic, and puts itself in a position of having to endlessly debate things that shouldn’t need to be debated…such as breast feeding. Among normal, natural human beings, it is not an issue.

    It is not the specie that is strange Buzz, it is our western civilization.

  10. Buzz Avatar
    Buzz

    It may be, and probably is, most obvious in western civilization, but it’s also an issue in eastern civilization and every other part of the modern world, which these days is almost everywhere. It’s mostly because there are so many people recommending old texts that don’t apply in a rapidly changing culture, and so people are confused.

    When we get confused we either give up trying to understand, or send everything back to the drawing board for analysis, including breastfeeding.

    Is it wrong to question everything we think is real?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *